Defense Minister explains proposal not to raise retirement age for military generals

Explaining the decision not to raise the retirement age for generals to 62, Minister of National Defense Phan Van Giang said the job of a military officer is very special.

Wondering why retirement age for general officers is not raised to 62?

On the afternoon of October 28, the National Assembly discussed in groups the draft revised Law on Officers of the Vietnam People's Army, with many opinions focused on raising the retirement age of active officers.

Concerned about the content of the regulation on retirement age for military officers at the general level, delegate Nguyen Van Manh - Deputy Head of the National Assembly delegation of Vinh Phuc province said that the draft stipulates the retirement age as 60 (applicable to both men and women). The age for men remains the same, only the age for women is increased from 55 to 60 years old compared to the old law.

Nguyen Van Manh (Deputy Head of the National Assembly Delegation of Vinh Phuc Province).

"The regulation of the age of 60 is not consistent with the regulations in the recently amended Law on Public Security. The Public Security stipulates the retirement age for male generals is 62 and for female generals is 60. The draft law is also not consistent with the Labor Law, because this law stipulates the retirement age is 62 for men and 60 for women," said Mr. Manh.

Delegate Thach Phuoc Binh - National Assembly Delegation of Tra Vinh said that in reality, there are officers at middle and high ranks who need to hold important positions but there are no suitable replacements. Therefore, it is necessary to consider extending the service age for some special positions.

In many countries with developed armies, the age of active service for officers is also differentiated by rank, but is often more flexible for senior ranks such as colonel or general if the officer is in good health and has made special contributions.

Therefore, according to Mr. Binh, the fixed retirement age for the highest ranks may limit the use of the experience of veteran officers. Therefore, it should be considered to extend the retirement age by 1-2 years for some ranks such as colonel and general, depending on the specific mission requirements.

Different retirement ages should be studied for each military branch.

Delegate Thach Phuoc Binh also suggested that the drafting committee study regulations on different retirement ages for each military branch and service in the law based on factors such as the specific work, health, mission requirements of each military branch and service and the benefits that this policy can bring to the military force.

Explaining the proposal, Mr. Thach Phuoc Binh gave many reasons such as the different military branches such as infantry, artillery, navy, air force, special forces... all have different job characteristics and health requirements.

Delegate Thach Phuoc Binh (Tra Vinh National Assembly delegation).

Each branch of the military has its own unique requirements and contributions. Applying a common retirement age could be unfair given the different physical requirements and workloads.

For example, air force or navy officers, who often work in dangerous and high-pressure environments, will find it difficult to maintain their health until the general retirement age. If the retirement age is adjusted appropriately, young officers will have the opportunity to advance and take on greater responsibilities.

"This will create motivation to strive and reduce the situation of "slow promotion" because many officers with seniority but not in good health still hold their positions, affecting the development ability of the young force," according to the delegate from Tra Vinh.

Citing experience from other countries and practical contexts, he said that many countries with professional armies such as the United States and Japan have applied different retirement age regulations for each military branch.

For example, the United States requires officers in special forces and rapid reaction forces to have a lower retirement age because the nature of the work requires high physical strength and quick reflexes.

Delegate Binh said that Vietnam is currently facing new demands in protecting its sovereignty, especially in its sea and island areas. To meet long-term tasks, the army needs a force of young officers with good health and endurance.

Therefore, different retirement ages will help maintain a team of officers with high combat readiness, meeting defense needs in the new context.

Minister of Defense explains

Speaking at the meeting, Minister of National Defense Phan Van Giang clarified concerns about the proposal to raise the retirement age for officers according to the draft law.

He said raising the service age limit will allow officers of the rank of lieutenant colonel or lower to retire with enough years of social insurance participation to receive a maximum pension of 75%, in accordance with the Law on Social Insurance.

Because according to this law, employees who have paid social insurance for 35 years for men and 30 years for women will receive a maximum pension of 75%.

Minister of National Defense Phan Van Giang speaks at the meeting.

Regarding the idea of ​​separating the retirement age for generals for men and women, the Minister of National Defense said: "We have calculated and recalculated, female soldiers should retire early because it is very hard. But up to now, there has rarely been a period when there were 3 female officers as generals. In the end, we decided not to separate the retirement age for men and women."

Regarding concerns about why the general level is regulated to retire at the age of 60, instead of up to 62 as in the revised Law on Public Security, the Minister of National Defense said that the work of military officers is of a special nature so it is difficult to raise it any further.

He gave the example of an officer around 40-45 years old, who still had to march with the army hundreds of kilometers a year. He walked 25-27 kilometers a day, sometimes up to 30 kilometers. If he could not find a place to sleep, he would have to walk for another hour, and there was no way he could get into a car after walking 5-10 kilometers.

"We must train during peacetime. If we only travel by car during peacetime and do not train, when war forces us to walk, we will not be able to travel," according to Minister of National Defense Phan Van Giang.

Source: https://www.baogiaothong.vn/bo-truong-quoc-phong-ly-giai-de-xuat-khong-nang-tuoi-huu-cap-tuong-quan-doi-192241028180939599.htm