So which way of walking is better for your health?
Benefits of walking with a friend
Many studies have also shown that brisk walking with friends makes the brain stronger and healthier. This can increase thinking ability. When walking with others and socializing, it will improve brain function, memory also becomes sharper. That is, walking with friends is much more beneficial for health, according to the Times Of India.
Ideally, you and your walking partner should walk at the same pace.
Additionally, walking with others is safer, especially for the elderly. If you have a walking partner, the risk of an accident is reduced.
Having a walking companion can also increase your motivation to keep up with your daily walking routine. It’s also a great opportunity to connect and share on a daily basis.
Science supports walking with a friend
Research from Harvard Medical School (USA) Harvard Health said that walking with others will be more beneficial. Walking is a cardiovascular exercise, helping to strengthen the heart and lungs and maintain overall health. When you walk with friends, your mental health will improve along with your physical health. Many people feel less lonely this way, according to India TV.
Walking alone is good too
Walking alone also has its own benefits that you can hardly get if you walk with others.
To get the most out of any exercise, speed and focus, mindfulness are key.
When you walk alone, you can set your own pace to maximize your benefits. This also helps you focus and be more mindful. It also helps foster a sense of self-reliance and accomplishment.
Which way of walking is best?
To get the maximum benefit, you need to walk fast enough that it is difficult to carry on a conversation, says Rujuta Diwekar, a sports science and nutrition expert in India. A leisurely stroll while chatting with a friend may not be enough, so ideally you and your walking partner should walk at the same pace, according to India TV.
Source: https://thanhnien.vn/di-bo-the-duc-mot-minh-hay-voi-ban-tot-hon-185240923193530438.htm
Comment (0)