Case of male student being asked to transfer schools at the beginning of the school year: Department of Education and Training gives "hot" instructions

(Dan Tri) - In response to the case of a 9th grade male student in Dak Lak who was not allowed to enter class for the past 10 days and was asked to transfer to another school, the Dak Lak Department of Education and Training directed the school to urgently allow the student to return to school.

On September 11, the Department of Education and Training of Dak Lak province confirmed that the unit had sent a document requesting the leaders of Victory Primary, Secondary and High School (Victory School), Buon Ma Thuot ward, to urgently contact the parents and let student D.TL (class 9A8) continue to study at the school to ensure the student's rights.

At the same time, request Victory School to report the contents related to the suspension of D.TL students from August 26 until now.

After 10 days of not being able to go to school, D.TL was admitted back to school on September 11 (Photo: Truong Nguyen).

"After receiving the school's report, the Department will base on the school's regulations and charter to handle the case in accordance with regulations," said a representative of the Dak Lak Department of Education and Training.

According to Victory School's report, student D.TL was absent from school from August 15 to 22 and had been absent from school in previous school years. L.'s parents did not proactively ask for permission for her absence, and the school only learned about her absence through the homeroom teacher.

Also according to the report, on August 26, based on the repeated violations, showing disrespect for school regulations and school discipline, causing difficulties in student management, affecting the quality of learning. The school temporarily suspended the student's attendance to assess the level of violation and to discuss and agree on a course of action with the parents.

"On September 3, the school worked with L.'s parent representative and recommended that the parents consider transferring the student to a learning environment more suitable to the family's conditions and circumstances," quoted from Victory School's report.

On September 9, L.'s mother returned from Korea and filed a complaint. On September 10, the school held a meeting and the parents accepted responsibility for not allowing the student to return to school on time and pledged to strictly follow school regulations.

Victory Primary, Secondary and High School suspended student D.TL for 10 days (Photo: Truong Nguyen).

The school will also create conditions for students to return to school from September 11 and assign teachers to supplement knowledge for students.

Ms. NTTT (35 years old, mother of L.) said that she let her son return to school on the morning of September 11, but she personally did not agree with the school's explanation.

Ms. T. said that the school's statement that L.'s family let her stay home from school without permission was not true, and she had evidence to prove what she said.

"I also ask the school to clarify the responsibility of the individuals and groups that have not allowed my child to go to school for the past 10 days. Not being able to go to school has affected my child's psychology," said Ms. T.

Parents confirmed that in previous school years, when allowing their children to be absent from school, they wrote complete permission forms, unlike what the school said (Photo: Truong Nguyen).

As Dan Tri reported, student D.TL went to Korea to visit his mother and was absent from school for 6 days. When he returned to school, he was asked to leave the classroom and go to the supervisor's office and asked to call a family member to pick him up.

Victory School suspended L. from August 26 to September 10. The school gave the reason that she was absent from school from August 15 to 22 without actively asking for permission, had an invalid leave request, and had been absent from school in previous years.

After that, the school worked with L.'s parent representative and concluded "requesting the parents to find a new environment suitable for the student's situation".

The school leaders confirmed that they had based on Article 38, Circular 32 of the Ministry of Education and Training to temporarily suspend L.'s studies at school and the school had not yet issued a document suspending L. from school because... a Disciplinary Council had not been established. The reason for not allowing L. to go to school was to allow her to reconsider her behavior.

Faced with the incident, L.'s mother returned to Vietnam from Korea to file a complaint with the Dak Lak Department of Education and Training, requesting the authorities to intervene in the case and ensure the rights of her child.

Student D.TL has been studying at Victory School since grade 2.

Source: https://dantri.com.vn/giao-duc/vu-nam-sinh-bi-yeu-cau-chuyen-truong-dau-nam-hoc-so-gddt-chi-dao-nong-20250911082806677.htm